There’s a storm brewing in our house and a fight upon us…and the conflict is being fueled by the marketing juggernaut that IS the Disney Princess collection.
I’ll preface this by saying that I’d vowed from the beginning to keep my home turf safe from junky mass-marketed toys; my oldest had an Elmo book, when she was little, and kissed Elmo in the book—but didn’t watch the show (or any tv, in my perfect mom days) until she was 2 1/2. And I don’t even think Elmo is bad. The toys in our house were wholesome award winners and played with lovingly, with small cartoon birds flying around our heads, gentle music surrounding us, and learning opportunities abounding. At least that is my recollection.
So then the Disney princesses arrived, and began a slow but all-consuming takeover, dressed for battle in (junky) dresses and 3 inch (if you measure to scale) high-heeled shoes. There is a bit of inevitability to this process, I suppose, when one is the parent of three girls, but here I’ll add that my husband is the main provider of princesses and their gear.The books arrived first with tales of love and marriage to the point that no one could mention a friend without saying “I’m going to marry [fill in name]”. No one in our house could date, or just be friends—it was all about marriage. With no understanding of the concept as they were marrying uncles, girlfriends, and in one case I believe a stuffed tiger. I hated the books and refused to read them, but they now seem the least of my problems.
The miniature little dolls were the next big problem—a, the children couldn’t dress them because their PARTS were too small, the DRESSES too tight-fitting, and children’s HANDS don’t work that way. So I was constantly dressing and undressing little rubber dolls and picking up shoes from here there and everywhere.The kids threw them aside, however, when the Barbie-sized princesses began their invasion—complete with full wardrobes, falling-off shoes, impossibly small accessories, and floozy hair. My dad summed it up in an email after Christmas; brand-new Aerial was missing, and I sent a note to my family asking if they’d seen her around in the wrappings, and his email came back “I saw the ho”. What he meant to say was “I saw the horse she came with,” but this was a clear case of the freudian slip and I think in fact the message was more correct than he knew.
And the horses, the HORSES. They turned my manly husband obsessive compulsive as he searched all over for a horse for each kid’s doll, paying Kmart something like $40 in shipping (maybe I exaggerate) to get us a Belle horse (‘because she’s really hard to find’) The horses, which provide no visible means of transportation as the dolls CAN’T SIT ON THEM WITHOUT FALLING OFF, do nothing but stand around covered in silver manes and jewels. That is they were covered in jewels until they began shedding them to remain stuck (possibly forever) to the kitchen floor.
What I remember at that age is loving Little House on the Prairie books and sure, I watched the show, too. But this wholesome activity did not involve 1000 plastic parts, high-heeled shoes, dresses that ripped if one looks at them wrong. And if Little House did have dolls, I’d venture to say they’d be modest. That is, I’d never expect Ma or Laura (doll-form) to be lying around flashing their lady-parts all over. My house is indecent with naked ladies since the kids can get the dresses off, but trying to put them on means stiff arms poked through torn holes in cheaply made gowns. Last night while watching the Biggest Loser I dressed 4 dolls because there’s only so much naked flesh a person can take.
The dolls provided a teachable moment, of sorts, the other day when the girls began lobbying for MORE princesses—they needed Jasmine, they claimed (who we found to be elusive even in the flesh on our visit to Disneyworld; a fellow 4-year old patron offered the opinion that she was dead, another byproduct of stories that inevitably involve killing and such, even if it is evil stepmothers). And they needed a prince, since only one is in our house. I’m not talking about my husband, who does remain the single male figure in this house of girls, but Snow White’s beau who came in a set and who flounces about in a manly tunic (my husband laid down the law that he stays dressed, less from a sense of modesty than from his cheaply made boots and cruddy pants that are impossible to get back on). “We need more boys” the girls claimed, for their princesses, but I pointed out that the lesson to be learned is that your girlfriends are who’s around to count on, and they didn’t need a man. I think the lesson perhaps was over their heads.
To sum up let me alleviate any lingering worry and report that the “ho” has been found; my obsessive husband launched a house-wide search that never turned her up (this from a person that loses his wallet, his shoes, anything not attached to him at a given moment) and we thought she was gone forever. But a game – a wholesome game, in fact, of “pretend we’re camping”, a game worthy of Little House – involved pulling out the sleeping bags they got for Christmas, and it turns out that Aerial, ho or no, had merely crawled in for a long winter’s nap. Even I found myself excited at her return. And ten minutes after she turned up, I picked her naked self off the floor.
